Will SCOTUS Hear This Crucial Case?

by
posted on May 19, 2025
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
U.S. Supreme Court
(Kjetil Ree via Flickr)

The NRA recently asked the U.S. Supreme Court to hear NRA v. Glass, a case that could determine whether or not 18-to-20-year-olds in Florida are able to exercise their constitutional right to keep and bear arms.

In 2018, the Sunshine State completely banned 18-to-20-year-olds from purchasing firearms. Anyone who violates the ban is subject to five years imprisonment, a fine of up to $5000 or both.

In response, the NRA filed a lawsuit in 2021, which argued that the ban violates the Second Amendment rights of 18-to-20-year-olds in Florida. Earlier this year, however, an en banc hearing from the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the purchase ban in a fractured decision. Such is why the NRA is now asking the high court to hear the case.

The NRA’s Petition for Certiorari focuses on the need for the high court to review the split between various lower courts over whether or not adults under 21 have Second Amendment rights.

“The right to keep and bear arms ‘belongs to all Americans,’ not ‘an unspecified subset,’” reads the petition. “A fundamental incident of adulthood in America is the enjoyment of constitutional rights, including the right to defend yourself, your family, and your home with common firearms. Stripping away an 18-year-old adult’s Second Amendment rights is thus fundamentally irreconcilable ‘with the principles that underpin the Nation’s regulatory tradition.’”

The petition also explains why Florida’s ban is unconstitutional thanks to the landmark decision in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen (2022), which determined that adults under 21 are among “the people” protected by the Second Amendment.

“Americans 18 years of age and older are considered adults who can vote, enter into contracts, marry, and enlist and fight for our country,” said John Commerford, executive director of the NRA Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA). “Those same adults are also guaranteed the right to defend themselves through the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The NRA is asking the Supreme Court to take up this critical case to safeguard the constitutional rights of adults under 21.”

This issue has been working its way through the courts for years. Now the high court has a chance to rule on this important issue. America’s 1st Freedom contributor Stephen Halbrook aptly wrote in 2023: “Make no mistake, some courts are engaged in massive resistance against Bruen, just as they did with Heller. Still, many courts are taking Bruen seriously and finding restrictions violative of the Second Amendment. What is unfolding is part of a larger historical struggle between freedom and government control, and it will never end.”

Latest

virginia.jpeg
virginia.jpeg

Virginia is Going After the Peoples’ Guns

As Virginia’s Democrat-controlled General Assembly and Senate move gun-control bills through committees, residents need to contact their representatives to let them know neither they, nor their guns, are to blame for crime.

Part 2: How the Mainstream Media Lost Touch With America—the Death of Local News

The demise of newspapers, small and large, has been well chronicled, but how this has impacted America’s most practical civil right, our right to keep and bear arms, has not often been considered.

 

The Armed Citizen® January 21, 2026

Around 7 a.m. on Nov. 7, 2025, near Los Angeles, a 79-year-old Vietnam War veteran heard his duplex tenant screaming. He found a naked 30-year-old man had forced his way into the woman’s home.

The DOJ Civil Rights Division is Hiring Second Amendment Attorneys

After Harmeet Dhillon, assistant attorney general for the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Civil Rights Division, was a guest on Gun Talk Media with Tom Gresham, NRA-ILA reported that Dhillon is “embracing a new style of litigation on behalf of the Second Amendment.”

Cynical Strategies To Subvert The Protection Of Lawful Commerce In Arms Act

Since President George W. Bush signed the bipartisan Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) into law on Oct. 26, 2005, those bent on civilian disarmament have sought to bypass the legislation’s clear commands. In fact, 20 years later, gunmakers were fending off a frivolous nuisance suit from the city of Gary, Ind., filed in 1999, despite the PLCAA and state-analogue legislation.

The New York Times Tries to Explain the Drop in Crime

The New York Times is attempting to explain away the Trump administration's success at lowering crime rates with these explanations.



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.