Vermont Gun Freedoms Shot Down—From Within

by
posted on May 29, 2018
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
verb.jpg
Photo by Streeter Lecka/Getty Images

From the beginning, the state of Vermont has been running an experiment in Second Amendment-style freedom, as Vermont is the original “constitutional carry” state. If someone can legally carry a handgun, then they don’t need a permit to do so in Vermont. At the same time, and by almost every measure, Vermont has long been one of the safest states in the nation. This drove the anti-gun Left crazy, as Vermont was proof in New England, of all places, that freedom works.

For this reason, although the state has given us government-empowering, if not outright socialist, politicians like Howard Dean and Bernie Sanders, Vermont nevertheless stayed pro-gun freedom. In fact, guns were one of the few issues on which Hillary Clinton was able to successfully get to the left of Sanders.

But now Vermont has—in one big, unpopular gun control package—passed a Michael Bloomberg wish list of bans and restrictions on its citizenry. And a governor with a pro-gun history, and who had made pro-gun promises to get elected, signed the legislation.

The gun control package includes a ban on the possession and sale of bump stocks, long-gun magazines that hold more than 10 rounds and handgun magazines that hold more than 15 rounds, unless purchased before Oct. 1, 2018. Lawmakers passed this even though the state’s assistant attorney general, David Scherr, told the Senate Judiciary Committee, “The attorney general has some serious concerns about the practical enforceability of this measure.”

The law mandates that background checks be conducted on most private gun sales—it makes an exception for immediate family members. It also bans all gun sales to adults who are 18 to 20 years old, although the law makes an exception for residents who complete a Vermont hunter safety course and those who are in the military or employed by a law enforcement agency.

Moreover, this gun control package allows police to confiscate a gun (or guns) from a person who is deemed to pose a threat. A judge would decide if the person could get his or her gun(s) back. The law also allows the state to seek an “extreme protection order” that “prohibits a person from possessing a firearm for up to one year.”

Anyone who violates these laws could get between six months and a year of jail time and/or fines between $500 and $1,000.

Republican Vermont Gov. Phil Scott had a desk brought out onto the front steps of the statehouse in Montpelier so he could sign the most restrictive gun control measures in the state’s history in front of a crowd. Gun-rights proponents showed up with signs and heckled the governor, who had promised in the past that he wouldn’t sign gun control legislation. Some in the crowd yelled “Traitor!” Others held signs saying, “One Term Gov” and “Not My Governor.”

Scott said he decided to sign the legislation after police stopped a possible murderer before he acted on plans to kill as many students as possible at a Vermont high school. The police made this arrest two days after the Feb. 14 school shooting in Parkland, Fla. Police had acted after someone alerted them to a threatening Facebook message from a student who, according to Vermont Supreme Court documents, said he wanted to “exceed the body count from the Virginia Tech shooting.”

Current state law at the time enabled the authorities to catch and prosecute this person before he might have acted. The system worked as it should have worked in Florida, where government at several levels failed to protect the innocent. Why, then, did Vermont need new bans and other restrictions on those who will follow the law? Obviously, this wasn’t about making Vermont safer, but about controlling law-abiding people in Vermont who choose to utilize their Second Amendment rights.

Bloomberg couldn’t get these restrictions passed after he funded a failed “sting operation” in late 2014 in which his group, Everytown for Gun Safety, placed fake gun ads from fictitious private sellers on various websites. Now, Vermont’s gun owners have had these restrictions piled on them by a governor who promised to protect their freedom. 

Frank Miniter is the author of Kill Big Brother, his latest novel, that shows how to keep government from infringing on our liberties. He is a contributor to Forbes and writes for many publications. His website is FrankMiniter.com.

Latest

PLCAA in marble
PLCAA in marble

Cynical Strategies To Subvert The Protection Of Lawful Commerce In Arms Act

Since President George W. Bush signed the bipartisan Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) into law on Oct. 26, 2005, those bent on civilian disarmament have sought to bypass the legislation’s clear commands. In fact, 20 years later, gunmakers were fending off a frivolous nuisance suit from the city of Gary, Ind., filed in 1999, despite the PLCAA and state-analogue legislation.

Winner-Take-All Elections Mark A New Chapter In The Second Amendment

Will a meaningful Second Amendment survive in Virginia? That this is even an open question shows how dramatically one election can reshape a state when it comes to the right to keep and bear arms.

Part 1: How the Mainstream Media Lost Touch With America—The Takeover by the Elites

Why is so much of the mainstream, legacy or corporate media opposed to our right to keep and bear arms? This three-part series attempts to answer these critical questions—understanding, after all, leads to solutions.

President’s Column | NRA Focus On The Vision

I can’t believe it’s been seven months since I was elected NRA president, and I’m already composing my eighth President’s Column. The officers never fully anticipated or appreciated the immense challenges we faced when elected.

Standing Guard | The NRA is Strong

The strength of the NRA is, and has always been, our membership. Without our millions of members, we would not be able to effectively rally behind elections for pro-freedom politicians; just as importantly, if not for our large membership, our representatives in office would not feel the same urgency to listen to us in this constitutional republic.

ATF Pursues Changes to Federal Ban on Unlawful Drug Users/Addicts

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) posted a proposed rule on the Federal Register seeking to redefine what constitutes an unlawful drug user for the purpose of the Gun Control Act.



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.