College Coach Tells Player: Firearms or Lacrosse, You Choose

by
posted on August 10, 2018
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
remote-2.jpg

Talk about overreach. It seems that a college athletic coach has no trust in his players to make the right decisions regarding firearms, even if they are law-abiding gun owners. Forget the fact that college students are adults.

The Palm Beach Atlantic University lacrosse coach seems to think that because social media posts about hunting—or guns in general—go against his grain, he can impose his belief system on his players. After the athlete, with the social media moniker of duckmanscholl on Instagram, made public one of his posts, his coach responded via text message: “You want to play lacrosse for PBA [Palm Beach Atlantic University], you won’t post pics of your guns and stuff. That’s simple. You want to continue to post this—you don’t play.”

The photos duckmanscholl posted were innocuous. One showed him holding a duck he harvested; another had him holding a holstered semi-automatic handgun.

The player made his choice. He will continue to exercise his First and Second Amendment rights, lacrosse be damned. That said, he also filed a complaint with the university, saying the postings do not violate school policy and implying that the coach crossed the line with his response. The school agreed and said administrators have counseled the coach.

This is not the only case of school employees using their beliefs to penalize students who dare to think otherwise. Just last week, a California high school teacher sent one student who was wearing an NRA T-shirt to the principal and chastised another. Thank goodness one of the student’s has a mother who stood up against the outrageous abuse of authority. The school board agreed.

When are teachers and coaches going to realize that it’s not their place to force their values down the throats of their charges? When a law-abiding citizen is doing nothing other than talking about something that drives them, the authority figures don’t need to get their noses out of joint.

Latest

PLCAA in marble
PLCAA in marble

Cynical Strategies To Subvert The Protection Of Lawful Commerce In Arms Act

Since President George W. Bush signed the bipartisan Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) into law on Oct. 26, 2005, those bent on civilian disarmament have sought to bypass the legislation’s clear commands. In fact, 20 years later, gunmakers were fending off a frivolous nuisance suit from the city of Gary, Ind., filed in 1999, despite the PLCAA and state-analogue legislation.

Winner-Take-All Elections Mark A New Chapter In The Second Amendment

Will a meaningful Second Amendment survive in Virginia? That this is even an open question shows how dramatically one election can reshape a state when it comes to the right to keep and bear arms.

Part 1: How the Mainstream Media Lost Touch With America—The Takeover by the Elites

Why is so much of the mainstream, legacy or corporate media opposed to our right to keep and bear arms? This three-part series attempts to answer these critical questions—understanding, after all, leads to solutions.

President’s Column | NRA Focus On The Vision

I can’t believe it’s been seven months since I was elected NRA president, and I’m already composing my eighth President’s Column. The officers never fully anticipated or appreciated the immense challenges we faced when elected.

Standing Guard | The NRA is Strong

The strength of the NRA is, and has always been, our membership. Without our millions of members, we would not be able to effectively rally behind elections for pro-freedom politicians; just as importantly, if not for our large membership, our representatives in office would not feel the same urgency to listen to us in this constitutional republic.

ATF Pursues Changes to Federal Ban on Unlawful Drug Users/Addicts

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives (ATF) posted a proposed rule on the Federal Register seeking to redefine what constitutes an unlawful drug user for the purpose of the Gun Control Act.



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.