Revisited: Biden Says Heller Decision was Incorrect

by
posted on September 24, 2020
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
49404615908_e9a810d3b2_o.jpg

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore

Just over a year ago, Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden said that the landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), which affirmed that the Second Amendment does protect an individual right, was incorrect.

Biden was asked during a town hall in Manchester N.H., “Do you agree with the D.C. v. Heller decision in regards to protecting the individual right to bear arms that are in common use and which are utilized for lawful purposes?”

“If I were on the court I wouldn’t have made the same ruling. OK, that’s number one,” responded Biden. In short, Biden said he does not believe the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms. 

The Heller decision clearly affirmed that the Second Amendment does, in fact, protect the right to own firearms “in common use” for lawful purposes, such as self-defense. 

Biden’s rejection of our Second Amendment rights should come as no surprise. He and his running mate, Kamala Harris, have released a litany of anti-freedom measures that they plan to enact should the pair win in November.

It should also be made known far and wide that Harris, during her tenure as district attorney of San Francisco, signed onto an amicus brief that argued the Second Amendment does not protect your right to keep and bear arms. Thankfully, the high court disagreed with her.

The Biden-Harris ticket is one that supported limiting freedom in 2008, as evidenced by Harris’ stance against Heller at the time, and it is one that still stands against freedom now, given Biden’s remarks in the past year and the pair’s plans to limit your rights.

President Trump, meanwhile, has made Biden’s anti-freedom stances known while touting his repeated defenses of Second Amendment rights. American freedoms is on the ballot this November.

Latest

William A. Bachenberg
William A. Bachenberg

President’s Column | What a Year It Has Been!

Wow! How fast a year has gone by since being elected president at the end of April last year! My first column was titled “It’s A New Day At The NRA,” and included the following:

Standing Guard | We Are the Good Citizens

I am a big believer in transparency. Each individual needs privacy from unconstitutional government intrusion—this especially includes what guns a law-abiding American citizen might own—but an association of freedom-loving citizens must be transparent.

U.S. v. Hemani Arguments

On March 2, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in U.S. v. Hemani. The case involves a defendant who is fighting a federal indictment for possessing a firearm while being a marijuana user.

President’s Column | Getting You Up to Speed

A lot of things have occurred over the past month or so that not all members are completely aware of. I’ll use my column this month to update you on some important issues—transparency.

Standing Guard | The NRA Gathers to Celebrate Our Freedom

The momentum we’re seeing across the country is both encouraging and energizing. January opened with tremendous activity at the NRA booth during SHOT Show, where members, industry partners and supporters stopped by to connect, share ideas and reaffirm their commitment to freedom and the Second Amendment.

Port Authority Doubles Down on Constitution-Free Zone with High-Profile Arrest

As anyone who has passed a basic civics class knows, the U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land. All legislation and official government actions are subject to its limits.



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.