Chicago Anti-Gun Politician Kept Private Arsenal

by
posted on January 15, 2019
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
gun-sales.jpg

It’s not unusual for the gun grabbers to have a “guns for me but not for thee” attitude, but a Chicago alderman is getting a first-hand experience of firearm confiscation.

It seems Alderman Ed Burke, in typical hypocritical fashion of the anti-gun politicians, is just another example of a gun grabber who thought he was above the law 

See, Chicago bars people from having guns inside City Hall and other government buildings. But knowing the mandate and abiding by it are two different things, because Burke kept 23 firearms in his office.

Burke must have thought that his history of being a Chicago police officer and private detective would be enough to excuse his flouting of the law. But a U.S. magistrate judge had other ideas and out Burke in his place recently when he was ordered to hand over his arsenal to U.S. Marshals. 

We hope Burke isn’t crying over the confiscation—not!  Here’s the thing. Why should someone who thinks it’s totally OK to place restrictions on law-abiding gun owners not be expected to abide by the law himself? 

Now, he might well brush off concerns about his guns by saying that some were historic guns and therefore posed no real threat. But then he’d be making himself look even more like a hypocrite, for alas, it wasn’t that long ago that Burke encouraged his constituents to turn in their own historic guns during a “buyback” program.

Leadership by example. What a concept! 

Latest

William A. Bachenberg
William A. Bachenberg

President’s Column | What a Year It Has Been!

Wow! How fast a year has gone by since being elected president at the end of April last year! My first column was titled “It’s A New Day At The NRA,” and included the following:

Standing Guard | We Are the Good Citizens

I am a big believer in transparency. Each individual needs privacy from unconstitutional government intrusion—this especially includes what guns a law-abiding American citizen might own—but an association of freedom-loving citizens must be transparent.

U.S. v. Hemani Arguments

On March 2, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in U.S. v. Hemani. The case involves a defendant who is fighting a federal indictment for possessing a firearm while being a marijuana user.

President’s Column | Getting You Up to Speed

A lot of things have occurred over the past month or so that not all members are completely aware of. I’ll use my column this month to update you on some important issues—transparency.

Standing Guard | The NRA Gathers to Celebrate Our Freedom

The momentum we’re seeing across the country is both encouraging and energizing. January opened with tremendous activity at the NRA booth during SHOT Show, where members, industry partners and supporters stopped by to connect, share ideas and reaffirm their commitment to freedom and the Second Amendment.

Port Authority Doubles Down on Constitution-Free Zone with High-Profile Arrest

As anyone who has passed a basic civics class knows, the U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land. All legislation and official government actions are subject to its limits.

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.