Glock Retools

by
posted on November 5, 2025
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
W3764 AFF 9998Resized

In order to ban many Glock semi-automatic pistols and some others, California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) signed Assembly Bill 1127. This legislation is scheduled to take effect on July 1, 2026. Specifically, it provides that licensed firearms dealers “shall not sell, offer for sale, exchange, give, transfer, or deliver any semiautomatic machinegun-convertible pistol.” 

Just after this legislation was signed, the NRA—along with the Firearms Policy Coalition, the Second Amendment Foundation, Poway Weapons & Gear and two NRA members—filed a lawsuit (Jaymes v. Bonta) challenging California’s new ban. The lawsuit argues that California’s ban on Glock-style handguns violates the Second Amendment, as the U.S. Supreme Court has held that “common” arms cannot be banned, and, moreover, that handguns cannot be categorically banned. California’s ban on many of the most popular handguns in America blatantly defies the Court’s precedent in D.C. v. Heller (2008).

Glock, meanwhile, announced it is discontinuing almost all of its current models. Instead, the Austrian pistol maker announced it would, soon begin shipping its new V series pistols. These would not be banned in California under this new law; they still, however, cannot be sold in California unless they somehow find their way onto the state’s very restrictive pistol roster. In the meantime, Glock has not been selling many guns in California, as only Gen3 Glocks are legal for sale in the state.

While some criminals have made and used illegal “Glock switches” that, if they work, can convert some semi-automatic Glock pistols to fire full auto, by banning “any semiautomatic machinegun-convertible pistol,” the state of California is infringing upon law-abiding citizens’ Second Amendment rights to own common firearms. And the state is attempting to punish manufacturers not for what the gun makers are doing, but rather for what third parties (in this case criminals) are doing. According to this unconstitutional law, if any enterprising criminal is able to find a way to make any legally sold semi-automatic firearm fire repeatedly with one trigger pull, then those guns will also be banned. This literally means that, in California, the criminals are in charge. Indeed, any rifle or shotgun whose barrel could be shortened with a hacksaw would seemingly be vulnerable to the same sort of “logic,” as “short-barreled” firearms also fall into a special class of regulation.

 

Latest

PLCAA in marble
PLCAA in marble

Cynical Strategies To Subvert The Protection Of Lawful Commerce In Arms Act

Since President George W. Bush signed the bipartisan Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) into law on Oct. 26, 2005, those bent on civilian disarmament have sought to bypass the legislation’s clear commands. In fact, 20 years later, gunmakers were fending off a frivolous nuisance suit from the city of Gary, Ind., filed in 1999, despite the PLCAA and state-analogue legislation.

The New York Times Tries to Explain the Drop in Crime

The New York Times is attempting to explain away the Trump administration's success at lowering crime rates with these explanations.

Winner-Take-All Elections Mark A New Chapter In The Second Amendment

Will a meaningful Second Amendment survive in Virginia? That this is even an open question shows how dramatically one election can reshape a state when it comes to the right to keep and bear arms.

Part 1: How the Mainstream Media Lost Touch With America—The Takeover by the Elites

Why is so much of the mainstream, legacy or corporate media opposed to our right to keep and bear arms? This three-part series attempts to answer these critical questions—understanding, after all, leads to solutions.

President’s Column | NRA Focus On The Vision

I can’t believe it’s been seven months since I was elected NRA president, and I’m already composing my eighth President’s Column. The officers never fully anticipated or appreciated the immense challenges we faced when elected.

Standing Guard | The NRA is Strong

The strength of the NRA is, and has always been, our membership. Without our millions of members, we would not be able to effectively rally behind elections for pro-freedom politicians; just as importantly, if not for our large membership, our representatives in office would not feel the same urgency to listen to us in this constitutional republic.

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.