Glock Retools

by
posted on November 5, 2025
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
W3764 AFF 9998Resized

In order to ban many Glock semi-automatic pistols and some others, California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) signed Assembly Bill 1127. This legislation is scheduled to take effect on July 1, 2026. Specifically, it provides that licensed firearms dealers “shall not sell, offer for sale, exchange, give, transfer, or deliver any semiautomatic machinegun-convertible pistol.” 

Just after this legislation was signed, the NRA—along with the Firearms Policy Coalition, the Second Amendment Foundation, Poway Weapons & Gear and two NRA members—filed a lawsuit (Jaymes v. Bonta) challenging California’s new ban. The lawsuit argues that California’s ban on Glock-style handguns violates the Second Amendment, as the U.S. Supreme Court has held that “common” arms cannot be banned, and, moreover, that handguns cannot be categorically banned. California’s ban on many of the most popular handguns in America blatantly defies the Court’s precedent in D.C. v. Heller (2008).

Glock, meanwhile, announced it is discontinuing almost all of its current models. Instead, the Austrian pistol maker announced it would, soon begin shipping its new V series pistols. These would not be banned in California under this new law; they still, however, cannot be sold in California unless they somehow find their way onto the state’s very restrictive pistol roster. In the meantime, Glock has not been selling many guns in California, as only Gen3 Glocks are legal for sale in the state.

While some criminals have made and used illegal “Glock switches” that, if they work, can convert some semi-automatic Glock pistols to fire full auto, by banning “any semiautomatic machinegun-convertible pistol,” the state of California is infringing upon law-abiding citizens’ Second Amendment rights to own common firearms. And the state is attempting to punish manufacturers not for what the gun makers are doing, but rather for what third parties (in this case criminals) are doing. According to this unconstitutional law, if any enterprising criminal is able to find a way to make any legally sold semi-automatic firearm fire repeatedly with one trigger pull, then those guns will also be banned. This literally means that, in California, the criminals are in charge. Indeed, any rifle or shotgun whose barrel could be shortened with a hacksaw would seemingly be vulnerable to the same sort of “logic,” as “short-barreled” firearms also fall into a special class of regulation.

 

Latest

17-aff_main_mediacrimereport.jpg
17-aff_main_mediacrimereport.jpg

Another Example of What Actual Free Speech Does for the Second Amendment

This is the sort of truth bombing X can now give us—thanks to Elon Musk’s purchase of the social-media site—if we are discerning about who we follow and take the time to be cautious about what we believe.

Hawaii Wants to Go Further Than Mere “Aloha Spirit” in Defiance of Citizens’ Rights

Within weeks of the U.S. Supreme Court’s hearing oral arguments in Wolford v. Lopez, Hawaii lawmakers are moving on legislation to find other ways to keep citizens’ Second Amendment rights effectively off-limits.

The DOJ Civil Rights Division Strikes Again

In a poignant rebuke of the Massachusetts handgun roster, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division submitted an amicus brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in the case Granata v. Campbell.

Armed Citizen Interview: NYC Homeowner

Moshe Borukh heard glass breaking downstairs in his Jamaica Estates home in Queens, N.Y., around 2:40 a.m. Borukh grabbed his pistol and investigated. He soon discovered that a man was inside his home.

Why Did This NFL Offensive Tackle Get Arrested in NYC?

Rasheed Walker thought he was following the law when he declared he had an unloaded Glock 9 mm pistol in a locked case to a Delta Air Lines employee at LaGuardia Airport in New York City on January 23.

The NRA Weighs in on “Unlawful Users”

With the U.S. Supreme Court scheduled to hear United States v. Hemani on March 2, the NRA, along with the Independence Institute and FPC Action Foundation, filed an amicus brief

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.