Rep. Eric Swalwell Threatens to Nuke Gun Owners

by
posted on November 19, 2018
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
slalwell-tweet.jpg

We all know the radical Left wants to confiscate our guns, and we’ve seen just that in places like Oregon and Maryland where red-flag laws have taken effect. But just how far will they go? Well, Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., might just win the prize for stepping way over the bounds by threatening to nuke gun owners.

In a tense social media exchange, a gun rights advocate baited Swalwell, who has made his anti-gun sentiment quite obvious in the past. The Twitter user, identified as Joe Biggs, tweeted: “So basically @RepSwalwell wants a war. Because that’s what you would get. You’re outta your fucking mind if you think I’ll give up my rights and give the gov all the power.”

That prompted the following response from Swalwell. “And it would be a short war my friend. The government has nukes. Too many of them. But they’re legit. I’m sure if we talked we could find common ground to protect our families and communities.”

That unleashed a storm of rants, including one from Cam Edwards, host of “Cam & Co.” who said: “Personally, I have a bigger problem with an elected official blithely talking about nuking his fellow Americans than my neighbor owning an AR-15.” Another came from Charles C.W. Cooke, a regular contributor to America's 1st Freedom, who wrote: "'You don’t need AR-15s because the government isn’t tyrannical, and, anyway, if you try to stop us taking them we will nuke you' is my favorite of all the gun control talking points."

Ever mindful of putting his foot in his mouth, Swalwell has backed off his statement, saying he was being sarcastic. But the fact remains, he has no regard for the lives of those who he considers his lessers.

Intent aside, we’re inclined to agree with Edwards, and Swalwell should know that fanning the flames of the gun debate with such rhetoric will only make law-abiding gun owners more adamantly stand by their rights. And you can darn sure bet that if a Second Amendment supporter had made a comparable statement, he’d probably be in jail by now. Funny how that double standard thing works.

Latest

William A. Bachenberg
William A. Bachenberg

President’s Column | What a Year It Has Been!

Wow! How fast a year has gone by since being elected president at the end of April last year! My first column was titled “It’s A New Day At The NRA,” and included the following:

Standing Guard | We Are the Good Citizens

I am a big believer in transparency. Each individual needs privacy from unconstitutional government intrusion—this especially includes what guns a law-abiding American citizen might own—but an association of freedom-loving citizens must be transparent.

U.S. v. Hemani Arguments

On March 2, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in U.S. v. Hemani. The case involves a defendant who is fighting a federal indictment for possessing a firearm while being a marijuana user.

President’s Column | Getting You Up to Speed

A lot of things have occurred over the past month or so that not all members are completely aware of. I’ll use my column this month to update you on some important issues—transparency.

Standing Guard | The NRA Gathers to Celebrate Our Freedom

The momentum we’re seeing across the country is both encouraging and energizing. January opened with tremendous activity at the NRA booth during SHOT Show, where members, industry partners and supporters stopped by to connect, share ideas and reaffirm their commitment to freedom and the Second Amendment.

Port Authority Doubles Down on Constitution-Free Zone with High-Profile Arrest

As anyone who has passed a basic civics class knows, the U.S. Constitution is the supreme law of the land. All legislation and official government actions are subject to its limits.

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.