Revisited: Biden Says Heller Decision was Incorrect

by
posted on September 24, 2020
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
49404615908_e9a810d3b2_o.jpg

Photo credit: Gage Skidmore

Just over a year ago, Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden said that the landmark U.S. Supreme Court decision in District of Columbia v. Heller (2008), which affirmed that the Second Amendment does protect an individual right, was incorrect.

Biden was asked during a town hall in Manchester N.H., “Do you agree with the D.C. v. Heller decision in regards to protecting the individual right to bear arms that are in common use and which are utilized for lawful purposes?”

“If I were on the court I wouldn’t have made the same ruling. OK, that’s number one,” responded Biden. In short, Biden said he does not believe the Second Amendment protects an individual right to keep and bear arms. 

The Heller decision clearly affirmed that the Second Amendment does, in fact, protect the right to own firearms “in common use” for lawful purposes, such as self-defense. 

Biden’s rejection of our Second Amendment rights should come as no surprise. He and his running mate, Kamala Harris, have released a litany of anti-freedom measures that they plan to enact should the pair win in November.

It should also be made known far and wide that Harris, during her tenure as district attorney of San Francisco, signed onto an amicus brief that argued the Second Amendment does not protect your right to keep and bear arms. Thankfully, the high court disagreed with her.

The Biden-Harris ticket is one that supported limiting freedom in 2008, as evidenced by Harris’ stance against Heller at the time, and it is one that still stands against freedom now, given Biden’s remarks in the past year and the pair’s plans to limit your rights.

President Trump, meanwhile, has made Biden’s anti-freedom stances known while touting his repeated defenses of Second Amendment rights. American freedoms is on the ballot this November.

Latest

17-aff_main_mediacrimereport.jpg
17-aff_main_mediacrimereport.jpg

Another Example of What Actual Free Speech Does for the Second Amendment

This is the sort of truth bombing X can now give us—thanks to Elon Musk’s purchase of the social-media site—if we are discerning about who we follow and take the time to be cautious about what we believe.

Hawaii Wants to Go Further Than Mere “Aloha Spirit” in Defiance of Citizens’ Rights

Within weeks of the U.S. Supreme Court’s hearing oral arguments in Wolford v. Lopez, Hawaii lawmakers are moving on legislation to find other ways to keep citizens’ Second Amendment rights effectively off-limits.

The DOJ Civil Rights Division Strikes Again

In a poignant rebuke of the Massachusetts handgun roster, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division submitted an amicus brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in the case Granata v. Campbell.

Armed Citizen Interview: NYC Homeowner

Moshe Borukh heard glass breaking downstairs in his Jamaica Estates home in Queens, N.Y., around 2:40 a.m. Borukh grabbed his pistol and investigated. He soon discovered that a man was inside his home.

Why Did This NFL Offensive Tackle Get Arrested in NYC?

Rasheed Walker thought he was following the law when he declared he had an unloaded Glock 9 mm pistol in a locked case to a Delta Air Lines employee at LaGuardia Airport in New York City on January 23.

The NRA Weighs in on “Unlawful Users”

With the U.S. Supreme Court scheduled to hear United States v. Hemani on March 2, the NRA, along with the Independence Institute and FPC Action Foundation, filed an amicus brief

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.