Schumer Vows Senate Will Vote on Gun-Control Bill

by
posted on March 12, 2021
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
31807851823_1f78c27a21_k.jpg
Lorie Shaull courtesy Flickr

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) vowed that the Senate would take up a vote on proposed anti-gun legislation that the U.S. House of Representatives passed.

“H.R. 8 will be on the floor of the Senate, and we will see where everybody stands. No more hopes and prayers, thoughts and prayers. A vote is what we need, a vote, not thoughts and prayers,” said Schumer.

The House voted 227-203, Thursday, in favor of H.R. 8, a bill that creates so-called “universal” background checks (so-called because, how can it be universal if criminals, by definition, won’t submit to these checks?). In reality, this bill, to even theoretically work, would need a registry of all guns.

“[T]he true effect of H.R. 8 would be criminalizing otherwise lawful conduct with firearms. The overbroad nature of the proposed legislation would criminalize many transfers that take place as part of hunting, recreational shooting, and even self-defense,” reported the NRA Institute for Legislative Action (ILA).

And as America’s 1st Freedom has previously reported, “All registration … would accomplish is to create a handy list for future government confiscation.”

“H.R. 8, so-called ‘universal’ background checks, cannot be enforced without a federal gun registry, will not prevent crime and will turn otherwise law-abiding citizens into criminals for simply loaning a firearm to friends or family members,” said Jason Ouimet, NRA-ILA executive director. 

This legislation blatantly ignores the criminal element in society that fails to adhere to the laws already on the books. And, at its core, it seeks to create a registry, which, if history has taught us anything, leads to confiscation.

Of course, proponents of H.R. 8 claim that it seeks to remedy so-called “loopholes.” Rep. Mike Thompson (D-Calif.), one of the co-sponsors, said of previous legislation that “when we passed the law, little did we know, it had some loopholes in it that we didn't know at the time. We didn't know there would be an internet, so we didn't prohibit internet sales without a background check.” 

Second Amendment-supporting Americans need to contact their legislators and voice their opposition to these gun-control schemes.

Latest

17-aff_main_mediacrimereport.jpg
17-aff_main_mediacrimereport.jpg

Another Example of What Actual Free Speech Does for the Second Amendment

This is the sort of truth bombing X can now give us—thanks to Elon Musk’s purchase of the social-media site—if we are discerning about who we follow and take the time to be cautious about what we believe.

Hawaii Wants to Go Further Than Mere “Aloha Spirit” in Defiance of Citizens’ Rights

Within weeks of the U.S. Supreme Court’s hearing oral arguments in Wolford v. Lopez, Hawaii lawmakers are moving on legislation to find other ways to keep citizens’ Second Amendment rights effectively off-limits.

The DOJ Civil Rights Division Strikes Again

In a poignant rebuke of the Massachusetts handgun roster, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division submitted an amicus brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in the case Granata v. Campbell.

Armed Citizen Interview: NYC Homeowner

Moshe Borukh heard glass breaking downstairs in his Jamaica Estates home in Queens, N.Y., around 2:40 a.m. Borukh grabbed his pistol and investigated. He soon discovered that a man was inside his home.

Why Did This NFL Offensive Tackle Get Arrested in NYC?

Rasheed Walker thought he was following the law when he declared he had an unloaded Glock 9 mm pistol in a locked case to a Delta Air Lines employee at LaGuardia Airport in New York City on January 23.

The NRA Weighs in on “Unlawful Users”

With the U.S. Supreme Court scheduled to hear United States v. Hemani on March 2, the NRA, along with the Independence Institute and FPC Action Foundation, filed an amicus brief

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.