Stephen Halbrook on How the American Revolution had a Lot to do With Gun Control

by
posted on June 8, 2025
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **

What transpired after the day of the shot heard ‘round the world said a lot about why the Founders put the right to keep and bear arms in the U.S. Bill of Rights.

After the battles at Lexington and Concord in April 1775, the English General Thomas Gage moved to confiscate of the arms of the residents of Boston.

Fearing that the townsmen might rise up and support their countrymen, General Gage connived to disarm them. According to the contemporary historian Richard Frothingham, “[T]he people delivered to the selectmen 1778 fire-arms [muskets], 634 pistols, 973 bayonets, and 38 blunderbusses.” That was a substantial number given that Boston had 16,000 inhabitants, that patriots had already sneaked most of the arms outside of the city and that many arms were likely secreted. 

There survives “A List of the Persons Names who lodge their Arms with the Selectmen pursuant to a Vote by them passed yesterday & also of the Number by each delivered.” (In The Founders’ Second Amendment (2008), I wrote that no such list was known to exist, but I finally found it.) It shows a total of 321 names with the types and quantities of arms each surrendered. The majority turned in just one musket (recorded as a “gun”), many of which included a bayonet.

The most prominent name on the list was Paul Revere, but he was the son of the famous patriot, who left Boston with the family. Paul Jr., who stayed in Boston to take care of the family’s properties, turned in three guns, a bayonet and a pair of pistols.

In response to an enquiry from Connecticut Governor Jonathan Trumbull, Gage replied, “You ask why is the town of Boston now shut up? I can only refer you, for an answer, to those bodies of armed men, who now surround the town, and prevent all access to it … . I am surrounded by an armed country … .”

Lexington and Concord, then Boston, were just the first steps to disarm and put the Americans under foot. As attorney and author Stephen P. Halbrook explains, this attempt to disarm Americans is reflective of the unconstitutional intentions some in America have today.

Latest

Holiday Gift Guide

The Trade Association for the Firearms Industry is Calling Out JPMorganChase

The CEO of JPMorganChase, Jamie Dimon, went on Fox News and claimed that JPMorganChase does not debank individuals, associations or corporations for ideological reasons. But the NSSF points out that Dimon has said different things before.

Gun Review | Rost Martin RM1C

I would like to introduce you to the Rost Martin RM1C—and yes, anyone familiar with the Glock 19 will immediately see its lineage. I nevertheless became intrigued by this gun, as I believe you might, thanks to some of its special features—and thanks to its price tag.

The NRA is Still Fighting for Our First Amendment Freedoms

Though the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 9-0 in favor of the NRA's argument in NRA v. Vullo, the decision sent the case back to a lower court, which ruled the offending government official had "qualified immunity." As a result, this case is ongoing.

Policing Should Not Be A Political Issue

Crime is a complicated topic, but there is an extremely simple rule that must be observed before one can begin to fight it effectively: One must genuinely wish to deal with the problem. Without such an elementary ambition, no amount of legislation, activity, taxpayer money or speechmaking will make the slightest bit of difference.

Gun-Control Group Inadvertently Admits Armed Citizens are Effective

The gun-control group Everytown inadvertently admitted that lawfully armed citizens stop a lot of crimes in America.



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.