Steve Scalise Defends Commitment to Second Amendment

posted on December 9, 2018
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
tv-white-noise.jpg

U.S. Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La., has the right mindset about violence that is perpetrated with guns. Just because someone falls victim to a criminal who uses a gun, that does not mean that guns are bad.

What a refreshing approach—refreshing enough that anti-gunners just can’t seem to wrap their head around the concept.

Whoopi Goldberg, a host on “The View,” peppered Scalise with questions about why he refuses to advocate for gun control, despite the fact that he was shot by a deranged gunman during a softball game more than a year ago.

The simple answer shouldn’t surprise gun owners, but it probably shook Goldberg.

“I’ve got deep-rooted conservative beliefs but they’re rooted in what the fundamental foundation of this country is based on,” Scalise said. And one plank of this country’s foundation concerns the right to self-defense.

“I mean when the Constitution was written initially they didn’t have a protection for guns because our founders just thought it was an assumed right,” he said, “later they added it in the Bill of Rights as the Second Amendment but they felt very strongly that every American has the right to defend themselves.”

Even then, apparently, this young nation’s leaders realized that bad things can happen to good people. It could be an attack by wildlife, or it could be dealing with a person who is intent upon harming you. Regardless, the fact is that police don’t exist to protect people misdeeds before they happen; the police merely put together the pieces in an effort to punish the evil-doer afterward.

That doesn’t do an individual a lot of good when his home is broken into and someone tries to kill them.

When Goldberg said that the Second Amendment pertained specifically to militia, Scalise rebuffed her, saying that question had been decided by the Supreme Court in the Heller case.

“The Supreme Court by the way answered this question a few years ago,” he said, “it was a 5-4 decision which is concerning I mean it should’ve been a 9-0 decision, but the Supreme Court said very clearly that you can own a gun not just as a member of the military but also individually to protect yourself and so that is the true meaning of the Second Amendment.”

Kind of makes you wonder how much dead air time was edited out when his answer surely left Goldberg speechless. Her neural circuitry most likely resembled the screens of white noise that used to be prevalent during the days of antenna television.

Latest

The Armed Citizen
The Armed Citizen

The Armed Citizen® January 21, 2026

Around 7 a.m. on Nov. 7, 2025, near Los Angeles, a 79-year-old Vietnam War veteran heard his duplex tenant screaming. He found a naked 30-year-old man had forced his way into the woman’s home.

The DOJ Civil Rights Division is Hiring Second Amendment Attorneys

After Harmeet Dhillon, assistant attorney general for the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Civil Rights Division, was a guest on Gun Talk Media with Tom Gresham, NRA-ILA reported that Dhillon is “embracing a new style of litigation on behalf of the Second Amendment.”

Cynical Strategies To Subvert The Protection Of Lawful Commerce In Arms Act

Since President George W. Bush signed the bipartisan Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) into law on Oct. 26, 2005, those bent on civilian disarmament have sought to bypass the legislation’s clear commands. In fact, 20 years later, gunmakers were fending off a frivolous nuisance suit from the city of Gary, Ind., filed in 1999, despite the PLCAA and state-analogue legislation.

The New York Times Tries to Explain the Drop in Crime

The New York Times is attempting to explain away the Trump administration's success at lowering crime rates with these explanations.

Winner-Take-All Elections Mark A New Chapter In The Second Amendment

Will a meaningful Second Amendment survive in Virginia? That this is even an open question shows how dramatically one election can reshape a state when it comes to the right to keep and bear arms.

Part 1: How the Mainstream Media Lost Touch With America—The Takeover by the Elites

Why is so much of the mainstream, legacy or corporate media opposed to our right to keep and bear arms? This three-part series attempts to answer these critical questions—understanding, after all, leads to solutions.

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.