Washington State Vies for Gun-Law Title

by
posted on November 11, 2018
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
washington-state.jpg

Gun rights advocates got shut out in Washington State on Tuesday, when more than 60 percent of the voters gave a thumbs up to one of the nation’s most restrictive gun laws on the books. That puts Washington near the top of the list for the title of state with the most gun control.

Unfortunately, Washington has been moving toward trying to claim that title for a couple of years. In 2014, voters gave the nod to a requirement for background checks for private gun sales; and in 2016, they said it would be OK for the courts to prevent people who might be deemed a danger to themselves or others from buying a gun.

Initiative 1639 goes way beyond those measures, though. Among other things, it raises the minimum age to buy a semi-automatic rifle to 21, though federal law put the age at 18. It also requires buyers of some guns to pass a more thorough background check, go through a 10-day waiting period and complete a training course.

The 30-page measure also contains a “dangerous access prevention” law that increases liability for gun owners who don’t securely store their weapons. If a firearm ends up in the hands of someone banned from owning a gun, for example, the legal owner could be charged with a felony. Heck, they can even get in trouble for letting a child pose for a photo while holding a gun.

In other words, the voters have given the state carte blanche in terms of using almost every conceivable way to turn a law-abiding gun owner into a lawbreaker, even though the state constitution echoes the intent of the Second Amendment.

The results show a divide in that state that reflects the same sort of split we see in the country, where areas with high population densities dictated the outcome. And, as expected, the initiative had financial backing from venture capitalist Nick Hanauer and Microsoft co-founder, the late Paul Allen. Indeed, an array of anti-gunners spent something to the tune of $5.5 million bankrolling the initiative, far outspending the gun rights supporters.

The Election Day outcome puts Washington in the company of states like California, Hawaii and Massachusetts when it comes to having the most restrictive gun laws in the nation. Of course, time will tell if criminals follow the law, though we suspect they won’t.

Latest

PLCAA in marble
PLCAA in marble

Cynical Strategies To Subvert The Protection Of Lawful Commerce In Arms Act

Since President George W. Bush signed the bipartisan Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) into law on Oct. 26, 2005, those bent on civilian disarmament have sought to bypass the legislation’s clear commands. In fact, 20 years later, gunmakers were fending off a frivolous nuisance suit from the city of Gary, Ind., filed in 1999, despite the PLCAA and state-analogue legislation.

The New York Times Tries to Explain the Drop in Crime

The New York Times is attempting to explain away the Trump administration's success at lowering crime rates with these explanations.

Winner-Take-All Elections Mark A New Chapter In The Second Amendment

Will a meaningful Second Amendment survive in Virginia? That this is even an open question shows how dramatically one election can reshape a state when it comes to the right to keep and bear arms.

Part 1: How the Mainstream Media Lost Touch With America—The Takeover by the Elites

Why is so much of the mainstream, legacy or corporate media opposed to our right to keep and bear arms? This three-part series attempts to answer these critical questions—understanding, after all, leads to solutions.

President’s Column | NRA Focus On The Vision

I can’t believe it’s been seven months since I was elected NRA president, and I’m already composing my eighth President’s Column. The officers never fully anticipated or appreciated the immense challenges we faced when elected.

Standing Guard | The NRA is Strong

The strength of the NRA is, and has always been, our membership. Without our millions of members, we would not be able to effectively rally behind elections for pro-freedom politicians; just as importantly, if not for our large membership, our representatives in office would not feel the same urgency to listen to us in this constitutional republic.

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.