White House Makes Anti-Freedom Positions Clear Ahead of Election

by
posted on November 1, 2024
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
White House
(Robert Lyle Bolton via Flickr)

“Ban assault weapons now,” the White House’s official account posted Wednesday on X, accompanied by the caption, “It’s time.”

The post comes less than a week before the 2024 election and on the back of countless claims from President Joe Biden (D)—and yes, he is technically still the sitting president—that nothing he or Vice President Kamala Harris (D) want to do infringes on the Second Amendment.

“From our cold, dead hands,” replied the NRA with an American flag included.

The renewed call to ban “assault weapons” also follows the Harris’ recent claims that former President Donald Trump (R), if elected again, would “terminate the Constitution” and noted that she is the one in favor of the Second Amendment.

Harris’ campaign issues page echoes this call as well, stating, “She’ll ban assault weapons.”

She also previously said on the debate stage in September: “We’re not taking anybody’s guns away. So, stop with the continuous lying about this stuff.”

The reality is that banning rifles lawfully owned by millions and millions of Americans does violate the Second Amendment and she has also been in favor of gun confiscation.

Estimates from the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) show that there are more than 28 million AR-type rifles in circulation. They are clearly protected under the “common-use” standard established by the U.S. Supreme Court in D.C. v. Heller (2008). With nearly 30 million of these rifles owned by law-abiding Americans, that standard is easily met.

As for the ban that Biden and Harris are so eager to impose, its previous iteration showed how ineffective these bans are. The Federal Assault Weapons Ban, passed in 1994 and that sunset in 2004, was found to have little, if any, effect on crime.

“The congressionally mandated study of the federal ‘assault weapon ban’ of 1994-2004 found that the ban had no impact on crime, in part because ‘the banned guns were never used in more than a modest fraction of gun murders,’” reported the NRA Institute for Legislative Action (ILA).

Latest

17-aff_main_mediacrimereport.jpg
17-aff_main_mediacrimereport.jpg

Another Example of What Actual Free Speech Does for the Second Amendment

This is the sort of truth bombing X can now give us—thanks to Elon Musk’s purchase of the social-media site—if we are discerning about who we follow and take the time to be cautious about what we believe.

Hawaii Wants to Go Further Than Mere “Aloha Spirit” in Defiance of Citizens’ Rights

Within weeks of the U.S. Supreme Court’s hearing oral arguments in Wolford v. Lopez, Hawaii lawmakers are moving on legislation to find other ways to keep citizens’ Second Amendment rights effectively off-limits.

The DOJ Civil Rights Division Strikes Again

In a poignant rebuke of the Massachusetts handgun roster, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) Civil Rights Division submitted an amicus brief to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in the case Granata v. Campbell.

Armed Citizen Interview: NYC Homeowner

Moshe Borukh heard glass breaking downstairs in his Jamaica Estates home in Queens, N.Y., around 2:40 a.m. Borukh grabbed his pistol and investigated. He soon discovered that a man was inside his home.

Why Did This NFL Offensive Tackle Get Arrested in NYC?

Rasheed Walker thought he was following the law when he declared he had an unloaded Glock 9 mm pistol in a locked case to a Delta Air Lines employee at LaGuardia Airport in New York City on January 23.

The NRA Weighs in on “Unlawful Users”

With the U.S. Supreme Court scheduled to hear United States v. Hemani on March 2, the NRA, along with the Independence Institute and FPC Action Foundation, filed an amicus brief

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.