White House Makes Anti-Freedom Positions Clear Ahead of Election

by
posted on November 1, 2024
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
White House
(Robert Lyle Bolton via Flickr)

“Ban assault weapons now,” the White House’s official account posted Wednesday on X, accompanied by the caption, “It’s time.”

The post comes less than a week before the 2024 election and on the back of countless claims from President Joe Biden (D)—and yes, he is technically still the sitting president—that nothing he or Vice President Kamala Harris (D) want to do infringes on the Second Amendment.

“From our cold, dead hands,” replied the NRA with an American flag included.

The renewed call to ban “assault weapons” also follows the Harris’ recent claims that former President Donald Trump (R), if elected again, would “terminate the Constitution” and noted that she is the one in favor of the Second Amendment.

Harris’ campaign issues page echoes this call as well, stating, “She’ll ban assault weapons.”

She also previously said on the debate stage in September: “We’re not taking anybody’s guns away. So, stop with the continuous lying about this stuff.”

The reality is that banning rifles lawfully owned by millions and millions of Americans does violate the Second Amendment and she has also been in favor of gun confiscation.

Estimates from the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) show that there are more than 28 million AR-type rifles in circulation. They are clearly protected under the “common-use” standard established by the U.S. Supreme Court in D.C. v. Heller (2008). With nearly 30 million of these rifles owned by law-abiding Americans, that standard is easily met.

As for the ban that Biden and Harris are so eager to impose, its previous iteration showed how ineffective these bans are. The Federal Assault Weapons Ban, passed in 1994 and that sunset in 2004, was found to have little, if any, effect on crime.

“The congressionally mandated study of the federal ‘assault weapon ban’ of 1994-2004 found that the ban had no impact on crime, in part because ‘the banned guns were never used in more than a modest fraction of gun murders,’” reported the NRA Institute for Legislative Action (ILA).

Latest

PLCAA in marble
PLCAA in marble

Cynical Strategies To Subvert The Protection Of Lawful Commerce In Arms Act

Since President George W. Bush signed the bipartisan Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) into law on Oct. 26, 2005, those bent on civilian disarmament have sought to bypass the legislation’s clear commands. In fact, 20 years later, gunmakers were fending off a frivolous nuisance suit from the city of Gary, Ind., filed in 1999, despite the PLCAA and state-analogue legislation.

The New York Times Tries to Explain the Drop in Crime

The New York Times is attempting to explain away the Trump administration's success at lowering crime rates with these explanations.

Winner-Take-All Elections Mark A New Chapter In The Second Amendment

Will a meaningful Second Amendment survive in Virginia? That this is even an open question shows how dramatically one election can reshape a state when it comes to the right to keep and bear arms.

Part 1: How the Mainstream Media Lost Touch With America—The Takeover by the Elites

Why is so much of the mainstream, legacy or corporate media opposed to our right to keep and bear arms? This three-part series attempts to answer these critical questions—understanding, after all, leads to solutions.

President’s Column | NRA Focus On The Vision

I can’t believe it’s been seven months since I was elected NRA president, and I’m already composing my eighth President’s Column. The officers never fully anticipated or appreciated the immense challenges we faced when elected.

Standing Guard | The NRA is Strong

The strength of the NRA is, and has always been, our membership. Without our millions of members, we would not be able to effectively rally behind elections for pro-freedom politicians; just as importantly, if not for our large membership, our representatives in office would not feel the same urgency to listen to us in this constitutional republic.

Interests



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.