Biden Asks God for One Thing

by
posted on April 15, 2021
** When you buy products through the links on our site, we may earn a commission that supports NRA's mission to protect, preserve and defend the Second Amendment. **
48605282006_e35020c4dc_k.jpg
Gage Skidmore courtesy Flickr

“If I get one thing on my list—the Lord came down and said, ‘Joe, you get one of these’—give me that one. Because I tell you what, there would be a ‘come to the Lord’ moment these folks would have real quickly. But they’re not. They’re not. They’re exempt,” said President Joe Biden (D) when speaking about the firearms industry and his desire to repeal the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) during a press conference.

The press conference was filled with patently false statements about your Second Amendment rights. A1F.com has already detailed his biggest lies from that press conference, but we wanted to circle back, as Biden’s press secretary so often says, and address his call for divine intervention to functionally bankrupt the firearms industry.

It’s no secret that Biden has long sought to repeal the PLCAA. His website lists as much; he campaigned on it; and the White House website recently published yet another declaration of Biden’s dishonest attempt to have trial lawyers go after manufacturers with frivolous lawsuits.

Though the White House website tangentially touches on this, it is the first thing listed on Biden’s website. And now, he has said that this is the “one thing on [his] list” that he wants to get done.

Let’s rewind and review the PLCAA, which protects manufacturers from being held liable for the criminal misuse of their products. This would be akin to suing a knife manufacturer for when a criminal uses knives in crimes. 

To be clear, as with other industries, firearms manufacturers can still be held liable for a number of other reasons, and they are not granted absolute immunities and exemptions as Biden would have you think. These manufacturers can still be sued should they violate standards surrounding sales and marketing of their products, if their products are found to be defective, and much more. They simply cannot be held liable for the criminal misuse of their firearms.

Imagine if every company or person could be held liable for every single criminal misuse of a product they make or sell. Those manufacturers, stores, and industries would be inundated with frivolous lawsuits that would functionally bankrupt them.

Therein lies Biden’s desire to repeal the PLCAA. It’s a dishonest, end-run around the Second Amendment. He wants to force firearms manufacturers out of business, which would functionally make the Second Amendment defunct.

“It is no exaggeration to say that while the Second Amendment protects your right to protect yourself, the PLCAA helps protect the Second Amendment. And it’s no coincidence that the same activists pushing for its repeal are also pushing for the end of private firearm sales and transfers, as this would be the easiest way to get guns if retail shops closed or refused to transact with the general public. If both were to become law, there would be no lawful way to transfer a firearm in America!,” wrote Jason Ouimet, executive director of the NRA Institute for Legislative Action.

Americans clearly don’t want this. They purchased firearms in record-setting numbers last year; in fact, an estimated eight million were first-time gun owners.

The NRA’s A1F.com will keep you up to date on any actions the Biden administration takes on this and other Second Amendment-related issues.

Latest

The Armed Citizen
The Armed Citizen

The Armed Citizen® January 21, 2026

Around 7 a.m. on Nov. 7, 2025, near Los Angeles, a 79-year-old Vietnam War veteran heard his duplex tenant screaming. He found a naked 30-year-old man had forced his way into the woman’s home.

The DOJ Civil Rights Division is Hiring Second Amendment Attorneys

After Harmeet Dhillon, assistant attorney general for the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) Civil Rights Division, was a guest on Gun Talk Media with Tom Gresham, NRA-ILA reported that Dhillon is “embracing a new style of litigation on behalf of the Second Amendment.”

Cynical Strategies To Subvert The Protection Of Lawful Commerce In Arms Act

Since President George W. Bush signed the bipartisan Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) into law on Oct. 26, 2005, those bent on civilian disarmament have sought to bypass the legislation’s clear commands. In fact, 20 years later, gunmakers were fending off a frivolous nuisance suit from the city of Gary, Ind., filed in 1999, despite the PLCAA and state-analogue legislation.

The New York Times Tries to Explain the Drop in Crime

The New York Times is attempting to explain away the Trump administration's success at lowering crime rates with these explanations.

Winner-Take-All Elections Mark A New Chapter In The Second Amendment

Will a meaningful Second Amendment survive in Virginia? That this is even an open question shows how dramatically one election can reshape a state when it comes to the right to keep and bear arms.

Part 1: How the Mainstream Media Lost Touch With America—The Takeover by the Elites

Why is so much of the mainstream, legacy or corporate media opposed to our right to keep and bear arms? This three-part series attempts to answer these critical questions—understanding, after all, leads to solutions.



Get the best of America's 1st Freedom delivered to your inbox.